Actualités

Management

imprimerenvoyerrecevoir

CIO en VO : Les projets sous contrôle (part 3)


Edition du 06/08/2008 - par CIO Etats-Unis

In the conclusion of the three-part series on successful project management, granular communications highlight performance lags and scope creep.



Go Granular

Granularization-not a word, but certainly a vital concept-is the third key to getting your projects under control. A basic dictum is that you have to track at one level of detail deeper than you ever have to report. In other words, to summarize and report at the task level a manager must track at the subtask level, and so on, down to activity and subactivity levels. Here are two suggestions to help along the way: Eliminate level-loading looseness and control communication at the granular level.

All too often, the responsible person assumes and reports a level-loaded scenario for each major activity, leading to looseness in tracking. For example, a team plans to deliver a function within a 10-week period. At the end of week one, the team reports 10 percent of the planned hours burned and of course, 10 percent completion. And so on, yielding a false sense of security to management and digging a dangerous pit just over the horizon.

Fear is often the driver of level-loading looseness. It is primarily the fear of reporting a slip to someone who does not realize that, in reality, projects do slip. A good project plan makes allowance for the inevitable slips.

The other major driver for level-loading looseness is that no one really knows all that has to be done at the early stages of a project, a task or an activity. According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), as a project unfolds, there will be an increasing understanding of what is necessary and how to do it.

It would be wise to apply that insight all the way down to the granular level. Recognize that individuals and teams cannot know everything sitting in an ivory tower as they plan, no matter at what level they operate. As time goes on, they discover in ever-greater detail exactly what needs to be done. That is granular progressive elaboration. This has three additional benefits.

< Page précédente (1/4)Page suivante (3/4) >



By John Troyer

John Troyer has more than 20 years of successful experience leading teams as a project, program, implementation, deployment and department manager in a wide variety of disciplines and environments, including DoD, aerospace engineering, IT, capital construction, finance, procurement and cost reduction.

Rejoignez cio-online.com, commentez cet article
Nombre de commentaires postés (0) - Lire tous les commentaires
Pour commenter cet article inscrivez vous ou identifiez vous ci-dessous si vous êtes déjà inscrit :

Email :
Mot de passe :  oublié ?
Mémoriser mes identifiants
L'ACTUALITÉ DU MOMENT
Sondage flash : les usages professionnels des réseaux sociaux peinent à convaincre

(01/12/2) - Malgré notre article sur l'étude d'Anderson Analytics, les usages (...)

Etude mondiale CIO/PWC : la sécurité trop souvent vue comme un simple problème technique

(01/12/2) - « Les dirigeants d'entreprises et d'administrations se préoccupent de plus en plus (...)

La réponse au paradoxe de Robert Solow

(01/12/2) - « On voit des ordinateurs partout, sauf dans les statistiques de productivité » a (...)

Guerre de la maintenance : SAP répond.

(28/11/2) - Avec l'établissement d'Enterprise Support à 22%, vous avez à affronter une véritable (...)

CIO en VO : la belle histoire d'Asterisk, le libérateur de l'IP-PBX

(28/11/2) - Imagine an IP voice and unified communications system that can be integrated into (...)

Recherche

Sondage flash
Pratiquez-vous le e-learning ?
Conférences
29/01/2009
TELECOMS : l'entreprise étendue et mobile
De 8h30 à 14h00 à l'Automobile Club de France - Paris
Agenda
Du lundi 1 décembre 2008 au mardi 2 décembre 2008
Forum Mondial du Logiciel Libre
Maison de la Chimie, 28 rue saint Dominique 75007 Paris